Coronavirus: Employers, Be Practical and Vigilant

With the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) across the globe and 100+ confirmed cases with an unfortunate 6 deaths in the United States, employers who haven’t already developed an Infectious and Communicable Disease policy in response to diseases such as the flu should be developing a policy and responsiveness plan.

An effective preparedness plan would include how to keep their employees informed and safeguarded (to the extent possible), while managing continuous business operations as well as interactions with the public and supply chain. Employers may want to look at their disaster preparedness plan which would provide considerations for maintaining staffing and business relationships with limited or no access to facilities. Like any policy development, employers should bring together a team with members from each level of the organization to ensure that all group considerations are being taken into effect.

Also, employers need to be strategic and recognize that COVID-19 is a communicable disease and that their policy should be written to ensure a comprehensive approach.

For example, do you know that the flu is far more rampant and deadlier than COVID-19?

Across the globe and since late 2019, COVID-19 statistics show that there are reported 92, 700+ cases with 3,100 deaths and recovery of 48,400 people.

In the U. S., the Center for Disease Control estimates that during the 2019-2020 flu season there have been at least 32 million flu illnesses, 310,000 hospitalizations, and 18,000 deaths.

Many employees come to work sick with coughing, sneezing, sore throat, runny nose, and watery eyes when PTO is exhausted or workloads demand responsiveness. The cold or flu (which are both contagious) quickly spread around the office, yet many employers do not have a policy in response to employees coming to work sick.

The CDC has shared that the health risk in the U.S. is a “low risk of exposure” at this time for the general public. Employers with employees who travel to international locations that are affected are at an elevated risk. Also, those who work in health care and anyone who has had close contact with persons affected with COVID- 19 have a higher risk. Employer policies should take into consideration the chance for risk and exposure of the employees, considering potential exposure from family members.

There are published guidelines from the CDC for considerations when developing a policy to respond to COVID-19. In conjunction with the CDC, employers may also look to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for additional resources on policy considerations when developing their policy.

Please also contact your Benefit Advisor for services that are available to assist you in developing a responsive Infectious and Communicable Disease policy.

______________________________________________

With more than 20 years of Human Resource Generalist & Executive Level HCM Management experience, Kloss serves as the Director for the Human Capital Management Department for Benefit Advisors Network (BAN). With a deep understanding of the increasingly complex and diverse HR industry, Kloss provides her expertise to BAN’s employee benefit brokerage members as well as their employer clients. She oversees all HR-related functions for the association, initiating pro-active, strategic compliance practices, which limits exposure in all areas of potential liability for BAN members and their clients.

Is it a Volunteer Program or Employee Activism?

Much is in the news today surrounding employee activism and it has employers wondering “do our policies open the door for employees to turn our volunteer program into an act of activism?”

Employer-based volunteering to help the disadvantaged – whether it be people, animals, or the environment – has been in the fabric of our workplaces since at least the 19th Century. Organizations such as the YMCA and the Salvation Army partnered with larger employers as a means of securing funding to further their cause. Through employee payroll deductions, employees were, and continue to, be able to support their philanthropic values by directly donating money through agencies such as United Way.

Read the full article

Preventing and Mitigating Stress in the Workplace

Reproduced with permission from Benefits Magazine, Volume 57, No. 1, January 202, pages 40-45, published by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans.

Employers have a duty to provide a safe workplace for employees. The author discusses preventive measures employers can take to reduce the risk of workplace violence and create a psychologically healthy work culture.

View the full article

Final Rule Released – U. S. Department of Labor

White-Collar Exemption and Overtime

Reporting that 1.3 million workers will now become eligible for overtime pay, the Department of Labor (DOL) has released its final rule to update the exemption requirements of the Executive, Administrative and Professional Employee (EAP) as well as Highly Compensation Executive (HCE) classifications.

After overcoming many hurdles, injunction enjoined and invalidation, the DOL released its final rules yesterday with an effective date of January 1, 2020. Additionally, the 2016 final rule that was declared invalid by the United State Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has been rescinded by the DOL.

Settling below the original published salary level and just slightly higher than the most recently proposed the DOL raised the nation’s exempt salary threshold from $455 per week/$23,660 annually to $684 per week/$35,568 annually.  As a reminder, this is the first time since 2004 that the salary level has been increased.  As previously published, these newest final regulations do not include any adjustment to the standard duties test for these “White Collar” Exemptions.

There are also no changes in overtime rules for Police Officers, Fire Fighters, Paramedics, Nurses, Laborers including non-management and production line employees, and non-management in maintenance, construction, and similar occupations. However, new or “special” salary levels have been released for both employees in the motion picture industry and certain U. S. territories.

Additionally, the new regulations will increase the salary threshold for certain HCEs from $100,000 to $107,000. It is important for employers to note that an HCE must be paid at least the weekly standard salary amount of $684.00 without nondiscretionary bonus, incentive pay or commissions. Non-discretionary bonus, incentive pay, or commission may be counted toward the annual salary requirement of $107,000.00.

Employers will still be able to use a nondiscretionary bonus, incentive pay, or commissions to satisfy up to 10% of the standard salary level for EAP classifications and as previously stated for meeting the annual salary requirement for HCEs. These payments must be paid annually or on a more frequent basis in order to be eligible. A one-time “catch-up payment of up to 10% of the total standard salary level may be made within one pay period of the end of the 52-week pay period for those employees who have not earned enough to maintain their exempt status. This makeup payment only counts toward the previous 52-week salary amount and not for the salary in the year that it was paid.

I continue to promote that the following actions steps can help employers determine the impact on their organization and encourage that they should be promptly initiated for the effective date of January 1, 2020:

  1. Identify employees currently classified as exempt who will fail the new salary test.
  2. Model potential costs based on possible response (e.g. raise pay to new threshold level, reclassify as nonexempt and pay overtime, or lower pay to offset overtime requirement).
  3. Review job descriptions and tasks of impacted positions to determine if certain exempt tasks and responsibilities may be reassigned or maintained with the current position.
  4. Consider how pay changes or other changes in job assignments may impact your organization (e.g., pay compression with next level, supervisory career paths).
  5. Develop administrative implementation plans including payroll and HRIS systems, in order to ensure compliance and maintain compliance with the three-year automatic update provisions.

If employers find that certain positions no longer meet the standards set out in the white-collar exemption, they are required to either (1) readjust duties and compensations to re-qualify their employee or, (2) the position(s) need to be reclassified as non-exempt and the employee(s) are required to receive overtime pay for all hours worked over 40 hours in a workweek.

Misclassifications in these white-collar exemption’s categories happen often. As employers apply the final salary guidelines, also know that salary level is just one criterion for exemption from overtime. The standards duties test can be hard to apply especially for administrative and lower-level management positions. These positions typically carry non-exempt duties and can be difficult to classify as exempt duties with the confines of the DOL regulations. Since, these groups consistently average over 40 hours a workweek – pushing upwards of 50- 60 hours, employers will need to ensure that the positions are correctly categorized as exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA applying both the salary threshold and the standard duties test.

Penalties for misclassification of employees range from recovery of back wages and an equal amount of liquidated damages. The DOL may also litigate and recommend criminal prosecution.  Employers who willfully violate or repeatedly violate the wage laws (Fair Labor Standards Act) may be assessed civil monetary penalties and more for child labor violations. Employees who file a complaint or who participate in a claim are also protected from retaliation.

Employers should also continue to monitor Wage and Hour laws as the DOL aims to update the salary requirements on a more frequent basis. This has been written into the final rules with the DOL using the notice and comment rule-making procedure.

Is the Worksite Disrupting our Employees’ Emotional Wellbeing?

Written by Bobbi Kloss, Director of Human Capital Management Services, Benefit Advisors Network. Published in the August/September issues of Los Angeles Advertising Human Resources Professionals and Entertainment Human Resources Network.

Mindfulness, employee engagement, employer of choice and holistic wellness are all relatively new adjectives being used to describe a 21st Century workplace culture. An employer can have a considerable amount of control when implementing marketplace solutions for creating these positive environments conducive to attracting and retaining employees (i.e. robust compensation package, an onboarding process, and communication tools). What though can an employer do to support a positive workplace culture when its own workplace behaviors are creating “high impact life events” for employees?

High impact life events differ from everyday life events that we as a general population rarely give a second thought to. We get up, we go to work. If the car has a flat tire, we stop and put air in the tire; we run out of milk, we make an extra grocery store stop. We move through our daily routines almost mechanically.

High impact life events are another story. When a high impact life event occurs, whether they be a joyous occasion or a somber event, they not only disrupt our daily routine, but an event can stop us dead in our tracks and affect us physically, financially and in many instances, emotionally. Many of these high impact life events take place outside of the workplace yet can bring disruption into the workplace when we as an employee attempt to navigate through the circumstances i.e. loss of a loved one, an unexpected illness, even those happy occasions such as marriage or the birth or adoption of a child. Any of these situations can cause stress, “a response of our body to any demand for change” to occur.

The workplace can even be the instigator of high impact life events, for example, events such as a loss of a job, failure to get a promotion, discrimination in the workplace, workplace bullying, unsafe
working conditions, unclear and inconsistent supervisor communication and directives, having too many responsibilities but little authority or control to… [Read the entire article]