BAN Blog

IRS Releases PCORI Fee For Plan Years Ending Before October 1, 2023

The IRS has released Notice 2022-59, which sets the applicable PCORI fee for plan years ending between October 1, 2022 and September 30, 2023 at $3.00 per covered life.

As a reminder, the PCORI was established as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to conduct research to evaluate the effectiveness of medical treatments, procedures and strategies that treat, manage, diagnose or prevent illness or injury.  Under the ACA, most employer sponsors and insurers were required to pay PCORI fees until 2019 or 2020, as it only applied to plan years ending on or before September 30, 2019.  However, the PCORI fee was extended to plan years ending on or before September 30, 2029 as part of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020. 

The amount of PCORI fees due by employer sponsors and insurers is based upon the number of covered lives under each “applicable self-insured health plan” and “specified health insurance policy” (as defined by regulations) and the plan or policy year end date.  The fee must be paid on or before July 31st each year.  The fees due by July 31, 2023 are for plan years ending in 2022 and are as follows:

  • For plan years ending between January 1, 2022 and September 30, 2022, the fee is $2.79 per covered life.
  • For plan years ending between October 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022, the fee is $3.00 per covered life.

Insurance carriers are responsible for calculating and paying the PCORI fee for fully insured plans.  The employer is responsible for paying the fee on behalf of a self-insured plan, including an HRA.  In general, health FSAs are not subject to the PCORI fee.

Employers that sponsor self-insured group health plans must report and pay PCORI fees using the second quarter IRS Form 720, Quarterly Federal Excise Tax Return.  The second quarter form is generally not released by the IRS until the second quarter of the applicable filing year (usually in or around May of the applicable filing year).  Therefore, the Form 720 used for the 2023 filing deadline will not likely be available until in or around May 2023, and employers who sponsor self-insured group health plans subject to the PCORI fee must wait to file until the correct Form 720 is available. 

The average number of covered lives for the plan year is generally calculated using the snapshot, snapshot factor, actual count, or Form 5500 method.  These counting methods will be described in more detail in a future alert as we approach the 2023 filing deadline.  Also note that because the PCORI fee is assessed on the plan sponsor of a self-insured plan, it generally should not be included in the premium equivalent rate that is developed for self-insured plans if the plan includes employee contributions.  However, an employer’s payment of PCORI fees is tax deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense.

______________________________

About the Author.  This alert was prepared by Barrow Weatherhead Lent LLP, a national law firm with recognized experts on the Affordable Care Act.  Contact Stacy Barrow or Nicole Quinn-Gato at sbarrow@marbarlaw.com or nquinngato@marbarlaw.com.

The information provided in this alert is not, is not intended to be, and shall not be construed to be, either the provision of legal advice or an offer to provide legal services, nor does it necessarily reflect the opinions of the agency, our lawyers or our clients.  This is not legal advice.  No client-lawyer relationship between you and our lawyers is or may be created by your use of this information.  Rather, the content is intended as a general overview of the subject matter covered.  This agency and Barrow Weatherhead Lent LLP are not obligated to provide updates on the information presented herein.  Those reading this alert are encouraged to seek direct counsel on legal questions.

© 2022 Barrow Weatherhead Lent LLP.  All Rights Reserved.

Pay Transparency and the Future of Compensation

Pay transparency has always been a fear of employers, likely because they did not or do not have a comprehensive pay plan that provides for pay equality. Employers don’t want this chink to be shown in their proverbial armor.

Negotiations of compensation, either for hire, raise, or promotion, is such a challenge that many books, blogs, and training materials exist to teach us how to properly negotiate for a higher salary. In fact, a Google search shows anywhere from 2,640,000,000 to 377,000,000 results, depending on your search terms.

The lingering effects of the pandemic on workforce dynamics are influencing employers to rethink their business design and pay practices. A new employment model is evolving as companies continue to face the challenges of a tight labor market. In this environment, total rewards incentives now include the creation of alternative employment relationships, flexible work plans, contingent staff, and nonlinear careers. Optimizing this new model, for the purpose of protecting their organization’s institutional knowledge, requires organizations to customize their approaches to attract and retain their workers.

In spite of the new developments, pay discrepancies still exist, particularly during employment negotiations. The disparity in pay has resulted in inequality across genders and races. State laws prohibit employers from disciplining employees for discussing pay with each other. Yet, with continuously developing legal requirements, return in strength of unions, and difficulty in competition for applicants, the practice of negotiating compensation individual by individual is being rethought.

For decades equal pay has been in a statutory requirement under federal laws such as the Equal Pay Act and the Civil Rights Act. New state laws in California will require greater pay transparency as a compliance requirement, and companies will need to rewrite policies and train hiring managers to negotiate to a properly constructed range in order to strive for the goal of pay equality. The states have been and continue to be providing the momentum toward equity and equality. Below is a list of states that mandate pay transparency for private employers.

California

California was the first state in the U.S. to legally require employers to provide the pay range for a job—if the candidate asks for it after the first interview. Passed in 2016, and updated annually, California’s Equal Pay Act prevents employers from asking about candidates’ previous salaries, and was the first law to use the phrase “substantially similar work” in regard to gender pay parity.

New York City

The law was originally set to take effect on April 28, 2022, but the City Council passed and Mayor Eric
Adams signed an amended version that delayed the effective date and made additional clarifications
to some of the law’s provisions to November 1, 2022.

Employers must disclose the minimum and maximum salary, or hourly wage, and benefits for each job,
promotion, or transfer opportunity. The range may extend from the lowest to the highest salary that
the employer in good faith believes at the time of the posting it would pay. The law does not cover jobs
that cannot or will not be performed, at least in part, in the city.

Colorado
In effect since January 2021, Colorado’s Equal Pay for Equal Work Act requires employers to list the
pay range and bene􀀨its for every job opening.

New York
As of September 1, 2022, Employers must disclose the minimum and maximum hourly or salary
compensation for each job, promotion, or transfer opportunity. The range may extend from the lowest
to the highest hourly wage or salary that the employer in good faith believes at the time of the posting
it would pay. The law does not cover advertisements for temporary employment at a temporary help
firm.

Connecticut
Connecticut passed a bill that took effect in October 2021, requiring employers to provide a salary
range for all extended offers, or before then, if the candidate asks for them.

This applies to transfers and promotions, too. Employers in Connecticut have to provide a pay range
for any instance where someone is moving into a new role.

Nevada
Effective October 2021, Nevada employers must provide a salary range to candidates after the first
interview automatically. (It’s essentially California’s law, but compulsory for the employer.)

Rhode Island
Starting in January of 2023, to adhere to the Rhode Island Equal Pay Law, employers must provide
candidates with a pay range if the interviewee requests it. This will apply to transfers and promotions
as well.

Maryland
Originally passed its Equal Pay for Equal Work Act in 2016, but updated it in 2020 with language that
requires employers to provide pay ranges to candidates upon request. Employers in Maryland are also
prohibited from asking candidates about their previous salary history.

Maryland employees should make a consistent practice of asking potential employers for pay ranges
prior to accepting an offer.

Washington
Washington amended its Equal Pay and Opportunities Act in 2019 to require employers to provide a
salary range after they’ve made an offer to a candidate if the candidate requests it. The same goes for
transfers and promos.

New Jersey
Employers must disclose the minimum and maximum salary, hourly wage, and benefits for each job,
promotion, or transfer opportunity. The range may extend from the lowest to the highest salary that
the employer in good faith believes at the time of the posting it would pay.

The Future of Compensation
A company’s leadership culture determines its policy decisions and how they structure its
compensation strategies. The goal should be to deliver a compensation plan design that includes a
combination of base pay, annual incentives, and long-term incentives while striving for consistency, pay
equity, and equality.
A compensation program not riddled with mystery or enigma will inspire over-achievement and guard
against under-achievement. Communication efforts educate all stakeholders on the totality of the
compensation package. Less informed job candidates tend to focus on base pay only, and this is what they traditionally negotiate during an employment offer. However, more informed job candidates understand the complete pay package combines fixed (i.e., salary + benefits such as health care + any housing, per diem) and variable pay (i.e. bonus, incentives, and other non-traditional benefits).

The deliverable is most effective when transparent, and the overall plan design should attempt to
determine the following:
• How the individual employee should be compensated based on their current and future value to
the organization.
• The total pay target for each component of the pay mix (base salary, annual incentives, and longterm
incentives), based on qualifications/experience, their ability to achieve business goals, and
not gender and race.
• Balancing over-reliance on market data versus the organization’s budget and compensation
philosophy, particularly when a job applicant’s future performance is still an unknown entity.

Transparency, communication, and customization are the factors needed to achieve common ground in
the employee/employer relationship when attempting to create a performance culture based on
competencies, potential and pay equality. The compensation practitioner’s purpose is to create a pay
package that is unambiguous, disciplined, explainable in thought processes, and based on coherent
business and human resources strategy.

IRS Adjusts Health Flexible Spending Account and Other Benefit Limits for 2023

On October 18, 2022, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released Revenue Procedure 2022-38, which increases the health flexible spending account (FSA) salary reduction contribution limit to $3,050 for plan years beginning in 2023, an increase of $200 from 2022.  Thus, for health FSAs with a carryover feature, the maximum carryover amount is $610 (20% of the $3,050 salary reduction limit) for plan years beginning in 2023.

The Revenue Procedure also contains the cost-of-living adjustments that apply to dollar limitations in certain other sections of the Internal Revenue Code. 

Qualified Commuter Parking and Mass Transit Pass Monthly Limit

For 2023, the monthly limits for qualified parking and mass transit are increased to $300 each, an increase of $20 from 2022.

Adoption Assistance Tax Credit Increase

For 2023, the credit allowed for adoption of a child is $15,950 (up $1,060 from 2022). The credit begins to phase out for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $239,230 (up $15,820 from 2022) and is completely phased out for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income of $279,230 or more (up $15,820 from 2022).

Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement (QSEHRA) Increase

For 2022, reimbursements under a QSEHRA cannot exceed $5,850 (single) / $11,800 (family), an increase of $400 (single) / $750 (family) from 2022.

Reminder: 2023 HSA Contribution Limits and HDHP Deductible and Out-of-Pocket Limits

Earlier this year, in Rev. Proc. 2022-24, the IRS announced the inflation-adjusted amounts for HSAs and high deductible health plans (HDHPs).

The ACA’s out-of-pocket limits for in-network essential health benefits have also been announced and have increased for 2023.  Note that all non-grandfathered group health plans must contain an embedded individual out-of-pocket limit if the family out-of-pocket limit is above $9,100 (2023 plan years). Exceptions to the ACA’s out-of-pocket limit rule are available for certain small group plans eligible for transition relief (referred to as “Grandmothered” plans). While historically CMS has renewed the transition relief for Grandmothered plans each year, it announced in March that the transition relief will remain in effect until it announces that all such coverage must come into compliance with the specified requirements.

A Reporting Penalties (Forms 1094-B, 1095-B, 1094-C, 1095-C)

The table below describes late filing penalties for ACA reporting.  The 2024 penalty is for returns filed in 2024 for the calendar year 2023, and the 2023 penalty is for returns filed in 2023 for the calendar year 2022.  Note that failure to issue a Form 1095-C when required may result in two penalties, as the IRS and the employee are each entitled to receive a copy.

_______________________________

About the Authors.  This alert was prepared for [insert agency name] by Barrow Weatherhead Lent LLP, a national law firm with recognized experts on the Affordable Care Act.  Contact Stacy Barrow or Nicole Quinn-Gato at sbarrow@marbarlaw.com or nquinngato@marbarlaw.com.

This email is a service to our clients and friends.  It is designed only to give general information on the developments actually covered.  It is not intended to be a comprehensive summary of recent developments in the law, treat exhaustively the subjects covered, provide legal advice, or render a legal opinion.

Benefit Advisors Network and its members are not attorneys and are not responsible for any legal advice.  To fully understand how this or any legal or compliance information affects your unique situation, you should check with a qualified attorney.

© Copyright 2022 Benefit Advisors Network. All rights reserved.

IRS Releases Final Rule to Fix ACA’s Family “Glitch”

On October 13, 2022, the IRS finalized regulations (the “Final Rule”) intended to revise the method of determining affordability under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for an employee’s family members by considering whether the coverage offered by the employer to the employee and their family members is affordable. The final regulations are effective on December 12, 2022. 

In addition, the IRS released Notice 2022-41 (the “Notice”), which is effective for cafeteria plan elections effective on or after January 1, 2023, and facilitates the changes under the Final Rule by permitting plans to update their change in status rules to allow employees to prospectively revoke their election under a group health plan (excluding health FSAs) for their family members who have enrolled or intend to enroll in Marketplace coverage. Most notably, for applicable large employers, the requirement to offer “affordable” coverage to full-time employees remains tied to the cost of employee-only coverage.  The rule does not require employers to make family coverage “affordable.”

The details of the Final Rule and Notice are discussed in more detail below.

Background

The ACA provides for a premium tax credit (PTC) for coverage purchased in the Marketplace if individuals do not have affordable, minimum value coverage available to them under an employer-sponsored group health plan.  After the ACA was enacted, the IRS interpreted the law to require affordability to be determined based on the lowest cost, self-only coverage offered to the employee by the employer.  In other words, an employer’s offer of family coverage was “affordable” if the employee’s cost for self-only coverage did not exceed 9.5% (as indexed) of the employee’s income.  Therefore, if self-only coverage offered to the employee was affordable, the employee’s family members would not be eligible for a PTC if they purchased coverage in the Marketplace even if the cost of family coverage was not affordable.

Over the years, this caused significant hardship to many families as the cost of family coverage offered by employers is often significantly higher than that of self-only coverage, and many family members were denied access to PTCs if the employee declined the employer’s offer of coverage for his or her family members because the coverage was cost prohibitive.  Advocacy groups routinely reached out to the Executive Branch regarding their concerns about the interpretation of the law. 

On January 28, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14009 which directed the IRS to, among other things, review existing regulations and agency actions to determine whether the regulations or actions were inconsistent with “the policy to protect and strengthen the ACA” and to examine policies or practices that may reduce the affordability of coverage or financial assistance for coverage, including for dependents. Accordingly, the IRS began to reevaluate the prior interpretation of the law, and, in April 2022, the IRS released proposed regulations intending to address affordability of coverage for family members.  Based on a renewed interpretation of the law, the proposed regulations provided that, for purposes of determining eligibility for PTCs, affordability of employer coverage for family members (referred to as “individuals eligible to enroll in the coverage because of their relationship to an employee of the employer” or “related individuals”) would be determined based on the cost of covering the employee and those family members.  Therefore, the portion of the annual premium the employee must pay for coverage of the employee and eligible family members would be used to determine whether the employee’s family members would be eligible for a PTC.

After the ACA was enacted, the IRS released Notice 2014-55 which was intended to address, among other things, the ability of employees to prospectively revoke their election in an employer’s group health plan to enroll in Marketplace plans during the Marketplace’s open enrollment or the employee is eligible for a special enrollment in the Marketplace. In this situation, if the employee was not eligible for Marketplace coverage, they could not revoke coverage for their family members to enroll in the Marketplace and would have to wait until the employer’s next open enrollment period.

IRS Releases Final Rule to Fix ACA’s Family “Glitch”

On October 13, 2022, the IRS finalized regulations (the “Final Rule”) intended to revise the method of determining affordability under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for an employee’s family members by considering whether the coverage offered by the employer to the employee and their family members is affordable. The final regulations are effective on December 12, 2022. 

In addition, the IRS released Notice 2022-41 (the “Notice”), which is effective for cafeteria plan elections effective on or after January 1, 2023, and facilitates the changes under the Final Rule by permitting plans to update their change in status rules to allow employees to prospectively revoke their election under a group health plan (excluding health FSAs) for their family members who have enrolled or intend to enroll in Marketplace coverage. Most notably, for applicable large employers, the requirement to offer “affordable” coverage to full-time employees remains tied to the cost of employee-only coverage.  The rule does not require employers to make family coverage “affordable.”

The details of the Final Rule and Notice are discussed in more detail below.

Background

The ACA provides for a premium tax credit (PTC) for coverage purchased in the Marketplace if individuals do not have affordable, minimum value coverage available to them under an employer-sponsored group health plan.  After the ACA was enacted, the IRS interpreted the law to require affordability to be determined based on the lowest cost, self-only coverage offered to the employee by the employer.  In other words, an employer’s offer of family coverage was “affordable” if the employee’s cost for self-only coverage did not exceed 9.5% (as indexed) of the employee’s income.  Therefore, if self-only coverage offered to the employee was affordable, the employee’s family members would not be eligible for a PTC if they purchased coverage in the Marketplace even if the cost of family coverage was not affordable.

Over the years, this caused significant hardship to many families as the cost of family coverage offered by employers is often significantly higher than that of self-only coverage, and many family members were denied access to PTCs if the employee declined the employer’s offer of coverage for his or her family members because the coverage was cost prohibitive.  Advocacy groups routinely reached out to the Executive Branch regarding their concerns about the interpretation of the law. 

On January 28, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14009 which directed the IRS to, among other things, review existing regulations and agency actions to determine whether the regulations or actions were inconsistent with “the policy to protect and strengthen the ACA” and to examine policies or practices that may reduce the affordability of coverage or financial assistance for coverage, including for dependents. Accordingly, the IRS began to reevaluate the prior interpretation of the law, and, in April 2022, the IRS released proposed regulations intending to address affordability of coverage for family members.  Based on a renewed interpretation of the law, the proposed regulations provided that, for purposes of determining eligibility for PTCs, affordability of employer coverage for family members (referred to as “individuals eligible to enroll in the coverage because of their relationship to an employee of the employer” or “related individuals”) would be determined based on the cost of covering the employee and those family members.  Therefore, the portion of the annual premium the employee must pay for coverage of the employee and eligible family members would be used to determine whether the employee’s family members would be eligible for a PTC.

After the ACA was enacted, the IRS released Notice 2014-55 which was intended to address, among other things, the ability of employees to prospectively revoke their election in an employer’s group health plan to enroll in Marketplace plans during the Marketplace’s open enrollment or the employee is eligible for a special enrollment in the Marketplace. In this situation, if the employee was not eligible for Marketplace coverage, they could not revoke coverage for their family members to enroll in the Marketplace and would have to wait until the employer’s next open enrollment period.

Final Rule and Notice 2022-41

Final Rule Related to Affordability and Eligibility for Premium Tax Credits

Under the final rule, for purposes of determining eligibility for a PTC, affordability of employer coverage for eligible family members is determined based on the employee’s share of the cost of covering the employee and those family members. In the preamble to the rule, the IRS explains that they believe the new reading represents a better reading of the relevant statutes and is consistent with Congress’s overall goal of expanding access to affordable health care coverage when enacting the ACA.

Additionally, the final regulations include, among other things, amendments to the rules relating to the determination of whether employer coverage provides minimum value.

Notice 2022-41

Consistent with the changes in determining affordability for family members’ coverage, effective for plan years beginning in 2023, Notice 2022-41 expands current election change rules by allowing for elections for family members’ coverage under an employer’s non-calendar year cafeteria plan, to be prospectively revoked if the following conditions are met:

  • One or more related individuals are eligible for a special enrollment period to enroll in Marketplace coverage pursuant to guidance issued by HHS and any other applicable guidance during the Marketplace’s annual open enrollment period; and
  • The revocation of the election of coverage under the group health plan corresponds to the intended enrollment of the related individual or related individuals in new Marketplace coverage that is effective immediately following termination of coverage under the group plan.

If adopted by the employer’s cafeteria plan, this new permitted election change does not apply to employee-only coverage.  Employees would still have to meet the eligibility specified in IRS Notice 2014-55 to revoke their own election under the employer’s plan, which requires the employee to be eligible for Marketplace open enrollment or special enrollment.   If the employee’s family members qualify for a special enrollment period under the Marketplace (or enroll in Marketplace coverage during the Marketplace open enrollment), the employee would be permitted to revoke their coverage and either enroll in self-only coverage offered by the employer or Marketplace coverage, if enrolling during a Marketplace open enrollment or special enrollment period. 

The employer can rely on the reasonable representation of the employee that the employee’s family members have enrolled or intend to enroll in Marketplace coverage for new coverage that is effective immediately following termination of group health plan coverage.

If an employer intends to adopt this new permitted election change, then the employer must amend their cafeteria plan to permit these changes and adopt this amendment no later than the last day of the plan year that begins in 2024.  The amendment can be retroactive/effective as of the first day of the 2023 plan year as long as the cafeteria plan operated in accordance with the changes within the 2023 plan year and notified employees of the changes for the 2023 plan year; however, the plan cannot be operated in a manner to allow revocation of coverage retroactively.

Next Steps for Employers

Employers do not need to make any changes to the way they determine affordability of coverage offered to employees, as affordability for purposes of the ACA’s employer shared responsibility provision (ESRP) has not changed.  Whether coverage offered by the employer is “affordable” for ESRP purposes will still be determined using the lowest cost, self-only coverage offered by the employer.  Employers are not penalized for failing to offer coverage that is affordable for an employee’s spouses or dependents.  

Additionally, if for the 2023 plan year, the employer intends to allow mid-year election changes pursuant to IRS Notice 2022-41, employers must communicate the change to employees effective not later than the beginning of the 2023 plan year and operate the plan in accordance with this change.  Further, the employer must adopt an amendment to the plan no later than the last day of the plan year that begins in 2024.

__________________________________

About the Authors.  This alert was prepared by Barrow Weatherhead Lent LLP, a national law firm with recognized experts on the Affordable Care Act.  Contact Stacy Barrow or Nicole Quinn-Gato at sbarrow@marbarlaw.com or nquinngato@marbarlaw.com.

This email is a service to our clients and friends.  It is designed only to give general information on the developments actually covered.  It is not intended to be a comprehensive summary of recent developments in the law, treat exhaustively the subjects covered, provide legal advice, or render a legal opinion.

Benefit Advisors Network and its members are not attorneys and are not responsible for any legal advice.  To fully understand how this or any legal or compliance information affects your unique situation, you should check with a qualified attorney.

© Copyright 2022 Benefit Advisors Network. All rights reserved.

Benefit Advisors Network, Sparrow Form Partnership
Sparrow’s Leave Management Solution to be Offered to All BAN Members

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
Jessica Tiller
jtiller@pughandtillerpr.com or 443-621-7690

San Francisco, CA and Beachwood, OH (10/12/2022)Benefit Advisors Network (BAN) – a national network of independent employee benefits firms – has partnered with Sparrow, the first high-tech, high-touch leave management solution for employers. This strategic partnership will enable BAN to provide a superior leave management solution that BAN members can offer to their employer clients. 

Under the terms of the new partnership, Sparrow’s leave management solution will be offered to all of BAN’s 120+ member firms in the U.S. and Canada.

“We are thrilled to enter into a partnership with Sparrow and cannot wait to offer their services to our members. As if employers weren’t tackling enough issues over the past few years, employers are also faced with the complex maze of employee leave policies,” says Bobbi Kloss, Director, Human Capital Management Services for Benefit Advisors Network. “There are currently federal leave laws such as the FMLA, ADA, and USERRA, as well as religious observations. In addition, there are 396 state-specific and 67 county-specific leave laws that change regularly. It has become nearly impossible to navigate this regulatory landscape with in-house expertise alone, which is why we are partnering with Sparrow to provide these services to our member clients.”

“In the last 10 years, navigating federal, state, and local leave regulations has only gotten more complex,” says Deborah Hanus, Co-founder, and CEO of Sparrow. “As companies across the US accommodate remote work, managing leave without compliance errors has become a major pain point for people teams. Sparrow’s high-tech, high-touch approach ensures that employee leave is stress-free.”

“Companies are recognizing that leave benefits and management of administration are an important component of a comprehensive benefits program to attract and retain talent. These companies rely on their benefits advisors to recommend best-in-class solutions in this emerging space,” said Paul Park, Chief Revenue Officer of Sparrow.

Continues Park, “Our partnership with BAN will allow Sparrow to extend our reach to clients who are dealing with increasingly complex workforce demands and their employees who expect a white glove level of support during a critical moment in their lives.”

About Sparrow
Sparrow is the first end-to-end leave management solution for modern employers to care for their people during major life events. Sparrow’s high-tech, high-touch approach automates the most painful parts of employee leave management, while our world-class leave specialist team ensures a premium experience for all types of leaves across the United States and Canada. By partnering with Sparrow, caring companies, such as Headspace Health, Figma, and Aurora, reduce compliance risks, enhance the employee experience, and contain costs.

Learn more at trysparrow.com and LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook.

About Benefit Advisors Network
Founded in 2002, BAN is an exclusive, premier, international network of independent, employee benefits brokerage and consulting companies. BAN delivers industry-leading tools, technology, and expertise to U.S. and Canadian member firms so that they can deliver optimum results to their employee benefits customers. BAN intentionally limits membership because of the highly collaborative interactions. For more information, visit the company’s website at www.benefitadvisorsnetwork.com.